Rush's Hoodie

Rush changing into his hoodie on the floor

If you have turned on a television in the past week, you may have noticed the massive amount of media coverage that the Trayvon Martin (the Florida teen unjustly killed by George Zimmerman) case is receiving. As if the case has not been compelling enough, the subplots that have spun off of this case have turned out equally as fascinating. My favorite being Illinois State Representative's Bobby Rush bold attire choice at a recent chamber meeting. 

While Rush was on the house floor discussing the Trayvon Martin case to his fellow congressmen, he began taking off his suit jacket to reveal a hoodie, symbolic of the one Trayvon wore on the night of his death. Almost immediately after this action, Rush was kicked off the house floor for breaking the chamber dress code. (Click here to watch Rush getting kicked off the floor). 

The big argument here is that other congressmen break the dress code all the time, but they have never been penalized like Rush was. Many government officials in support Rush have also noticed the unfair enforcement of the dress code, such as house minority leader Nancy Pelosi who stated, “If you’re going to enforce it {the dress code}, enforce it, but don’t be selective about it.” 

So, why isn't the dress code being enforced for the whole house?  Also, if they're not making a statement like Rush was, why would a congressman show up to a house meeting underdressed? Congressmen fifty years ago never had the nerve to show up to a formal house meeting underdressed, so why is it normal now? 

In my opinion, not just the house, but we as a society are becoming increasingly casual dressers. But, when did this happen? Are our values changing with appearance decreasing in importance? 

And finally, do you think If Trayvon Martin was wearing a sport coat instead of a hoodie he would have still been murdered? 

Pro Doctor Killing?

Pro Life or Pro Choice? That seems to be the buzzing question nowadays. As if the arguments behind abortion weren't complicated enough, our pals down in Tennessee have decided to kick it up a notch. A new bill entitled The Life Defense Act of 2012 is currently making its way through the Tennessee House of Representatives. This bill would make it mandatory for the state to publish the names of every doctor who performs an abortion and detailed statistics about the women who have undergone the procedure. Tennessee wishes to pass this bill in hopes of frightening abortion doctors into discontinuing their practice. 

If you have not yet realized how dangerous this bill could potentially be, allow me to explain. 

Abortion doctor George Tiller was shot to death as he entered
his church in Wichita, Kansas in 2009.

In the past 35 years, abortion doctors have faced, 8 murders, 17 attempted murders, 42 bombs, 176 cases of arson, 99 cases of attempted arson, 191 cases of assault and battery, 420 death threats, 524 cases of stalking, and 4 kidnappings (NFA).

If this bill passes  these numbers will only increase. The state, regardless of their viewpoints, should not be able to utilize the threat of illegal violence onto doctors for doing something legal. I'm aware that some of you reading this blog may be morally opposed to abortions and support pro life, but shouldn't you also support the lives of the doctors that have now been put under threat by their state government? Why aren't the doctors' lives considered as important as the life of a fetus in the eyes of the politicians who wrote The Life Defense Act of 2012?

I don't care who you are, what your views are, or where you're from, I think we can all agree here that the government in no context should accommodate crimes and criminals.  

Girls on Youtube

In my last post, I introduced the idea of the internet being dangerous to young girls. If you have not read my last blog post entitled "Am I Ugly" (which can be read HERE) then you may be unaware of a growing trend of middle school and junior high aged girls posting videos on youtube asking the people of the internet whether they are pretty or not. 


Up until today I thought that these videos were the most dangerous types of videos girls of that age could post. But, I was proved wrong, oh so wrong. 


The girl in the video below, lets call her Leap Day Girl, may be a tad older than the girls that post the Am I Ugly videos, but Leap Year Girl exhibits the same maturity level. 
WARNING: This video contains cursing, if you are not comfortable with that, do not watch!

How in this girl's mind is it okay to post a video like this? The pure ignorance of it is enough to be disgusted by if you are not already appaled by the number of swears used per sentence. I think the funniest part of the video is the part where she states, "THIS IS WHAT SOCIETY'S COME TO", like leap year is some sort of stupid choice we've made as a society. She obviously has no idea that there has to be an extra day every four years to keep our calendar stabilized, and this is the ignorance she is receiving so much attention for. 

The first time I saw Leap Day Girl's video I immediately thought back to a comment I received in my last post from fellow AS classmate, Ozakh Ahmed, which said, "I think that girls our age should lead by example because we forget how much of an impact we hold on them {younger girls posting videos on the internet}." It made me ask myself, 'How do girls my age (16) and above portray correct internet and video mannerisms online?' 

The answer is, we don't. Take the very popular, very controversial video, originally titled "Asians in the Library" video for example (which can be seen to the below). 

The young woman from this video is aged somewhere between 18 and 22, goes to a highly ranked college (UCLA), and is just about as ignorant as Leap Day Girl. She displays herself as the epitome a horrible role model for younger girls, such as Leap Day Girl, through her disgustingly racist jokes and comments. So is this UCLA student part of the reason why younger girls think its okay to post offensive videos online? If anything she's not helping the issue. I know that there are plenty of older girls that post sophisticated, politically correct videos on youtube, but they do not receive half the attention that the shockingly distasteful videos posted by girls their same age get. But shouldn't this negative attention ward off younger girls from posting equally distasteful videos online? No, because they are too young to know any better. 

I'm aware that I have presented a lot of information to think about with these last two blog posts, but there are two final questions that I wish to leave you readers with: 1. Why do we see so many girls and young women posting ignorant, offensive, and shocking videos on the internet? 2. Are there any boys and young men that have done this before, and if yes, have received as much attention for it?